I don't know the difference between the quat and euler
I fly with int_euler stabilization and quat stabilization. I found a little difference. the euler seems to be more stable， quat generates a little vibration. but quat seens to be more robust All right, the above is all my guess and experiment result. So the question is. WHY the krooz use euler instead of quat? 
Administrator

Hi, which stabilization system you use is not tied to the board.The euler implementation is easier to understand, but can't deal with the singularities that a Euler representation inherently has... Why Sergey chose int_euler I don't know... how stable it flies IMHO mostly depends on tuning (the same parameters for both won't give you the same result).On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Eltonwu <[hidden email]> wrote: I don't know the difference between the quat and euler _______________________________________________ Paparazzidevel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzidevel 
only to confirm ... i testes krooz with both and not see any difference.
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:32:50 +0100 From: [hidden email] To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Paparazzidevel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization Hi, which stabilization system you use is not tied to the board.The euler implementation is easier to understand, but can't deal with the singularities that a Euler representation inherently has... Why Sergey chose int_euler I don't know... how stable it flies IMHO mostly depends on tuning (the same parameters for both won't give you the same result).On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Eltonwu <[hidden email]> wrote: I don't know the difference between the quat and euler _______________________________________________ Paparazzidevel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzidevel _______________________________________________ Paparazzidevel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzidevel 
Free forum by Nabble  Edit this page 